Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Rebel10

Author: Helge Gabert

Date: 16:28:46 10/29/98

I upgraded to Rebel10 (at the higher price, by the way --- nobody has contacted
me and offered me a refund) and I'm a little dissapointed with the playing
strength.  It seems like Rebel10 is s-l-o-w, and the anti-GM default option is
the likely culprit.  An example:  BT2630, #27.  Where Rebel9 finds the move
e5-e6! after 0:53 on my P90, Rebel10 with anti-GM set to "smart" finds this move
after 5:00, and with anti-GM set to "off" still needs more than 2:00 to find the
winning move.  This is just one example, of course, but there seems to be a
trend . . . I'm testing more positions.  However, I do like the improved
database functions (the search mask in particular).  So, I guess, I can always
use the Rebel9 engine within Rebel10.

• Re: Rebel10 Ernst Walet 00:54:05 10/30/98
  • Re: Rebel10 Helge Gabert 09:09:09 10/30/98
    • Re: Rebel10 Ernst Walet 23:28:31 10/30/98
• Re: Rebel10 Bruce Moreland 19:31:51 10/29/98
  • Re: Rebel10 Helge Gabert 07:17:07 10/30/98
    • Re: Rebel10 Enrique Irazoqui 09:11:53 10/30/98
      • Re: Rebel10 Helge Gabert 11:58:43 10/30/98
  • Therefore Chess Knowledge Is Not Systematic Enough! Graham Laight 03:07:45 10/30/98
    • Re: Therefore Chess Knowledge Is Not Systematic Enough! Bruce Moreland 00:19:17 10/31/98
      • Re: Therefore Chess Knowledge Is Not Systematic Enough! Graham Laight 15:38:00 10/31/98
    • Re: Therefore Chess Knowledge Is Not Systematic Enough! Komputer Korner 23:39:56 10/30/98
    • Re: Therefore Chess Knowledge Is Not Systematic Enough! William H Rogers 06:32:55 10/30/98

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.