Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:43:49 08/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2003 at 08:22:30, Bo Persson wrote: >On August 08, 2003 at 07:40:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 08, 2003 at 06:47:34, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>On August 07, 2003 at 23:48:51, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>You guys can figure out the rest i bet seeing this code. >>>> >>>>All that bitboard idiocy always. This kicks the hell out of it. >>> >>>I doubt it, I can with bitboards incrementally generate 59 Mn/s on my 2Gig, you >>>claim 73 Mn/s on 2.1Gig, but that's not incrementally I bet. >> >>What do you mean by incrementally? > >That move generation tests are silly, because they compare apples to organges? Did not you learn that it is better to ignore everything that vincent say? He attacks personally people who disagree with him so it is better to say nothing if you disagree with him. My post was not about the importance of the tests but a simple question to sune. Sune said that he is using incremental move generator and I simply asked what he exactly means by it. It is unimportant to discuss about subjects that vincent talk about unless he apologizes about his bad behaviour. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.