Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:44:51 08/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2003 at 07:08:02, Sune Fischer wrote: >On August 15, 2003 at 07:01:19, Uri Blass wrote: > >>>>Movei simply does not clear hash tables at very fast time control and starts to >>>>clear them only if it has enough time relative to hash tables. >>> >>>Hmm, I think you should be consistent and either decide to clear or not. >>>If you do clear them you get some simplicity in the hash design. >>> >>>-S. >> >>No >> >>not clearing them in the way that I do it is simple and the only problem is that >>in this case after some moves at slow time control all the hash is going to be >>unavailable because it is going to be used by old entries that are not going to >>be replaced because they have bigger depth. >> >>At blitz it is not important because I am not going to be close to a situation >>of full hash tables so I let myself not to clear them. >> >>Uri > >Maybe you need to reconsider your replacement scheme? >Curing the illness is better than treating the symptom :) > >-S. My replacement scheme is simple (deeper is better) It is no problem in one search because I prefer to remember hash move when there is a long search but when I have another search the deeper from old iteration is irrelevant. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.