Author: Peter Stayne
Date: 08:36:13 08/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
I think it's constructive to look at who's got more resources behind the development of the hardware in question: Intel or AMD vs. FPGA board makers. Intel and AMD have FAR more resources at hand to keep their chips running far faster at running chess software than a specialty board could run its hardware version. Brutus is an interesting approach, but it's performance will lag compared with the top software engines. >Sorry, Uri, but that sounds too much like wishful thinking to me. : ) >The handwriting is on the wall!!! It is not the current performance that >matters, but is the potential or promise of this new approach which should get >our attention and debate, IMHO. > >Bob D. >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.