Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Bob....how strong Crafty on Blue Pacific (@3.9 trillion p/s)?

Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba

Date: 10:26:26 10/31/98

Go up one level in this thread


On October 31, 1998 at 10:40:58, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 30, 1998 at 14:43:19, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>>
>>What would be the expected performance of craty on a 64-processor Sun Enterprise
>>10000?
>>As far as I understand, it has symmetric multiprocessing.
>
>
>
>Assuming no "bottlenecks" it should be roughly .7*64 times faster.  However,
>I wouldn't be certain that the .7 holds...  IE I have a single lock for each
>of the two hash tables.  With 64 cpus, that is likely going to produce some
>blocking conditions.  I carefully only lock while I read an entry then unlock,
>but it is possible that this will start to add up.  Not having a 64 processor
>machine to work on, I can only speculate.  In Cray Blitz, with 32 processors,
>I didn't see significant blocking... but there I did everything in assembly
>and the lock/load/unlock and lock/store/unlock for hashing was *very* quick.
>
>Also I don't know how sun has done their 64 processor architecture.  A non-
>blocking crossbar is very expensive for 64 processors.  Also, what about memory?
>Cray uses a bunch of memory banks (things that can do 2 reads and 1 write at
>the same time) to avoid processor stalls.  What does Sun do?  If the memory
>bandwidth isn't there, then the .7 is going to shrink...

I will find out the technical details, they appeared in Unix's review a few
months ago. But for seven million dollars, I think they ought to provide
something good!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.