Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:56:07 09/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2003 at 03:44:22, Johan de Koning wrote: >On September 03, 2003 at 09:08:46, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >[to recurse or not to recurse] > >>Let's talk about the good aspects, i save out a lot of expensive function calls. > >Funny. :-) > >>If i remember well The King isn't recursive either. Johan no doubt reads this >>and will say: "no way" when it isn't :) > >No Way! >I'm not sure if I just confirmed your memory or if I denied it. > >Now please stop calling my name, or Frans', or whoever's, in threads that we >don't want to read at all. Since "we know shit" about parallelorisming we won't >be able to back you up. Try evaluation or TT latency. :-) I think that the subject of being recursive or not being recursive is important not only for parallelorism. For me it is more interesting if there are programmers who tried recursive and non recursive for one processor and if they got speed improvement from the non recursive possibility and how much speed improvement did they get from it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.