Author: Martin Andersen
Date: 04:22:29 09/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2003 at 06:48:26, Peter Fendrich wrote: > >Of course I have spam filters but I can't say that they are as effective as you >claim. Maybe it's Outlook that sucks in this respect... >It's not as easy as before to compose those rules by yourself - the subject just >doesn't tell and the text body is build up by some random characters and an >image with the real message. >During 14 days I have about 100 mails automatically moved to my Junk mail folder >but it should be about 300. The other 200 mails I have to move myself. >/Peter There are a lot of different approaches to spam-filtering. It has been shown that filters based on the Bayesian classification is most effective (http://www.mozilla.org/mailnews/spam.html). I never use Outlook so I have no idea how spam filtering works there. Of course the Mozilla filter doesn't take them all, I would say 90-95% of all spams are removed from my inbox. Martin.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.