Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 07:26:15 09/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2003 at 14:00:00, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 07, 2003 at 16:14:54, JW de Kort wrote: >[snip] >>Dear Uri >> >>Thanks for your reply. Strangly my engines plays better against Gerbil than >>against TSCP. My search is not to bad and far more complicated than TSCP's. My >>better search has no effect due to the bad evaluation. That is why i want to >>work on that at the moment. > >That is unusual. > >You might analyze several failures against TSCP (with a very strong engine) and >see if you can find a consistent point of failure (king safety/passed >pawns/etc.) > >Then you might learn what needs fixing. > >Tactical strength does not imply playing strength. In fact, I wrote a program >that projected best fit parabolic curves through parameter sets and that would >automatically tune for strongest tactical performance for Beowulf. It made it >stronger tactically, but overall it played much worse with the new parameters. Is there somewhere I can read more about this? Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.