Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 10:33:36 09/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 13:24:32, Uri Blass wrote: >With all these problems it drew 4 games against Sjeng1.5 in Leo's tournament But it's still doing quite a bit worse overall :) >Crafty is a weaker program than the commercial but suggesting that it is >inferior in everything is wrong. I never say it was weaker in everything. But I _know_ it's worse in evaluation and extensions, and some parts of the pruning can be made safer. I can see what Bob does (credits to him for that), and I can test what he does, and I know it's worse than what I do. If it would be the other way around, I'd do what Bob does, for hopefully obvious reasons! >I believe that commercial are better than it but part of them may be not better >in the same depth because they do more pruning. True. But the original reason is nonsense. How can you conclude Crafty must be better because it does less pruning - quality counts for something too you know. You could test this actually and see what the actual result is, but it would be completely irrelevant to this thread anyway. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.