Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 20:28:56 11/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 1998 at 17:13:28, odell hall wrote: > >Hello Albert Silver > > > I set my hiarcs6 on monitor mode in hopes of finding the times and depth that >hiarcs used to make moves 18.ne2 and 21. Arc1. Strangely on move 18 after about >a minute I see that hiarcs considers it in the info window below the move list, >but it never adopts the move in it's main line. Maybe it decided to move at the >exact moment that the computer considered ne2. As for 21. ARC1 My hiarcs did not >even consider the move , altlhough i must admit I let it think for only five >minutes. It's beyond my understanding, I certainly did not fabricate the >moves!!! I notice I wasn't able to reproduce some moves in the hiarcs deen >hergott match. It may be for the same reasons (whatever they are) that I cannot >produce a move made by my own hiarcs!!. ON move 18. My hiarcs considered 18.a3 >for the longest time!! I think that would have been much better the the move it >actually played 18.Ne2 As to your comments about Anti-computer positions, I >think rebel 9 would have handled the position much, much better as I had rebel >analyze the game and it came up with much better moves. This game shows that >hiarcs is not the positional master people claim that it is, I think that title >belongs exclusively to Rebel Put Hiarcs 6 on aggressive style. It plays better that way. In the Deen Hergott match, Hiarcs was on aggressive style. -- Komputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.