Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 13:04:26 09/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2003 at 13:55:43, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >Final result >------------ > > Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - > > 1 Shredder 7.04 : 43.5/ 70 62.1 2489 2576 72 58 > 2 The King 3.23 skr : 43.0/ 70 61.4 2490 2571 72 56 > 3 Junior 8 : 41.5/ 70 59.3 2492 2557 74 61 > 4 Fritz 8 : 39.5/ 70 56.4 2495 2539 77 60 > 5 Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 31.5/ 70 45.0 2505 2470 61 79 > 6 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 29.5/ 70 42.1 2507 2452 51 76 > 7 Ruffian 1.0.5 : 28.0/ 70 40.0 2509 2439 55 74 > 8 Hiarcs 8 : 23.5/ 70 33.6 2515 2396 57 68 > As Jorge said, Chessmaster's book needs to be improved very much. Playing with general.ctg instead of remis.ctg, it had a much better performance. But maybe there is another book that makes Chessmaster to play even better. Tough questions, as we need many many games to prove anything. My question is how good would you perform, if you participated in this tournament instead of Ruffian for example. And playing of course with your "boring, playing for a draw" style in every game. Do you think you could reach 14.5 points? Would the result be much different, if you set CONTEMPT FOR DRAW in that way that engines play for a win?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.