Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: RK 2003 (120'/60) Comparison between forecasts and final result

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 23:28:03 09/19/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 19, 2003 at 20:10:53, zeidoun wrote:

>Not surprising to see the Shredder 7.04 leading this tournament, but the result
>was very close.
>I hope u will test the Attack1.2DP5 setting, it's actually the strongest in
>almost all the Time Controls, even in longer time controls. I've got very
>encouraging results against F8 in long time controls.
>Derek Paquette the most serious tester of the Attack1.2DP settings, he is having
>also very encouraging results. he's winning against one of the Top 10 GM.
>
>Follow the games.

     Hi Zeidoun
     I have not yet found the time to test the
     Shredder 7.04 Attack1.2DP5 settings and am
     still waiting for a crosstable with results
     of 300-500 games played vs various other
     engines. As long as I have nothing to compare
     with and Shredder 7.04 default is winning anyway,
     I see no reason to test other things. It's the
     same problem with CM9-settings ... how many
     times had we thought (after 50-100 games) to
     have found the best settings but later on, after
     200 games or matches vs engine X we lost our
     dreams.
     Kurt





This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.