Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days?

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 06:48:33 09/25/03

On September 24, 2003 at 16:28:57, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>I try to use _most_ of main memory for serious games, and if you have a
>1 gig machine, I generally use something like hash=784M, hashp=40M,
>cache=128M, and go from there...

Interesting.  Is a 40M pawn hash table really useful for Crafty?  How big
are your pawn hash entries?  My pawn hash table contains just 256 entries,
where each entry is 128 bytes.  The last time I tried, increasing the size
of the table gave just a very small speedup (less than 2%, if I recall
correctly).

Tord

Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Robert Hyatt 08:28:55 09/25/03
- Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Francesco Di Tolla 07:42:12 09/26/03
  - Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Robert Hyatt 19:03:45 09/27/03
- Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Tord Romstad 10:02:22 09/25/03
  - Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Ricardo Gibert 04:01:49 09/26/03
    - Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Tord Romstad 07:15:44 09/26/03
    - Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Gerd Isenberg 06:49:49 09/26/03
      - Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Uri Blass 08:59:10 09/26/03
  - Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Tony Werten 22:03:33 09/25/03
    - Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Uri Blass 01:41:33 09/26/03
Re: hash table size - is a power of 2 still an advantage these days? Uri Blass 07:43:56 09/25/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.