Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 11:08:30 10/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2003 at 13:14:55, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On October 06, 2003 at 11:23:49, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On October 06, 2003 at 10:56:50, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>>1)If you want to be productive then give me the words that I was rude and >>>>insulting so I will know not to repeat my bad behaviour. >>>> >>> >>>No, today I have been very productive stopping your nonsense here. More, you are >>>not going to tell me innocently that you are not awared about your Mridul >>>repply. >>> >>>It seems to be that you ignore all the Professional and Techincal Profile of >>>Mridul underestimating a first his assevarations. >> >>I just came back after being away for a couple of days, and I am amazed >>to see the length and the heat of this thread. It's hard to understand >>what you guys are fighting about. As far as I can see, Uri has replied >>to Mridul twice in this thread: >> >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?319213 >>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?319225 >> >>I have read both replies very thoroughly and tried really hard to find >>something which can be interpreted as offensive, but without success. >>It is completely incomprehensible to me that anybody can take offense of >>either of Uri's replies to Mridul. >> >>Tord > >what really threw the fuel on the fire was Christophe's reply ;) But it doesn't make sense to flame Uri for that, does it? I don't see many posts attacking Cristophe in this thread. It is a waste of time to look for any kind of logic in flamewars like this, I suppose. :-) Tord >flamewars are what make internet discussion fun. > >anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.