Author: Pat King
Date: 13:08:02 10/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2003 at 13:27:30, Russell Reagan wrote: >On October 07, 2003 at 13:08:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>I'm working on incremental attack >>tables right now so that I don't have to mess with it. > >Be sure that you can really benefit from the overhead involved, because when you >go incremental, you have that overhead no matter what. If you do things on the >fly, you save work in cases where you don't need it. I know several people >prefer to do things on the fly, but I don't know of anyone that has tried both >ways and uses the incremental approach, but I certainly don't know what everyone >does. > The only thing I do on the fly is the raw material score. I once figured that this made sense to something like 8 ply (I've got a slow engine on a slow machine). Almost anything more complex doesn't justify an incremental approach IMHO (and I only say "almost" because I hate stating absolutes). Pat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.