Author: blass uri
Date: 21:18:36 11/07/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 1998 at 23:09:32, Mark Young wrote: >On November 07, 1998 at 12:35:40, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On November 07, 1998 at 09:40:14, Mark Young wrote: >> >>>On November 07, 1998 at 07:02:42, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >> >> >>>>I understand you better now. And yes, Junior 5 is very, very strong. Amir said >>>>that J5 should be about 50 Elo points stronger than J4.6. In my opinion this is >>>>too conservative. >>> >>>You said it, he is way too conservative in my opinion also. >>> >> >>If we are talking about elo based on games against humans then I do not think >>that he is too conservative. > >I think Junior 5 is much better then 50 elo points playing humans. I don't know >if Amir played Junior 4.6 on ICC, but I bet it would score worse then 50 elo >points under Junior 5.0 I thought about tournament time control and not about fast time control on ICC. I know that the results of Junior4.9 and Junior5 were not clearly better than the results of the previous Juniors on slower hardware(even previous to Junior4.5) so I think that the difference against humans at tournament time control is not more than 50 elo. Uri > > > >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.