Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 17:14:26 10/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2003 at 17:17:45, Tim Foden wrote: >On October 11, 2003 at 05:32:40, José Carlos wrote: > >>On October 11, 2003 at 05:19:23, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >> >>>On October 11, 2003 at 05:09:13, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>>On October 11, 2003 at 05:02:59, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 11, 2003 at 04:30:36, José Carlos wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 11, 2003 at 01:37:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 13:11:42, José Carlos wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:47:19, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:37:56, José Carlos wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>On October 10, 2003 at 12:10:27, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>What a shame... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christophe >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You have the right to ignore any post you don't like. >>>>>>>>>> Personally, I couldn't care less about Bas hardware. I'm interested in the >>>>>>>>>>problem itself, the nodes and the PV's. >>>>>>>>>> So Bas, thanks for posting your analysis. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> José C. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>So you mean that mentionning the processor type and speed together with the >>>>>>>>>analysis is useless? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Is it the opinion you want to defend? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For me? Yes. Is that bad? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> José C. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Then why mention the hash table size and not the processor type/speed? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Why post the entire, long, boring analysis and not just the solution time and >>>>>>>score? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christophe >>>>>> >>>>>> Why post boring tounament talbes? Why post boring questions about how to run >>>>>>this or that program under this or that GUI? Why post boring commercial >>>>>>advertisments about a new version or a patch? Why post boring "how does alpha >>>>>>beta search work" questions? >>>>>> Your question and all my questions have the same answer: what I'm interested >>>>>>in is not necessarily what the rest of the world is. I respect posts I'm not >>>>>>interested in because I know someone is. >>>>>> >>>>>> José C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>The question is the value of a posting if one is interested in reading it. >>>>> >>>>>When I see a time indication in a result then I am interested in the hardware >>>>>used. If this information is not provided then the time indication is worthless. >>>>>Can you compare it? No. >>>>> >>>>>Alessandro >>>> >>>> 1. "Worthless for you" != "a shame" >>>> 2. You want to compare? Fine. Must then everyone else want to compare? Of >>>>course not. >>>> 3. If someone gives you for free something you don't need, will you say "it's >>>>a shame you gave me this thing I don't need"? Or would you rather say "thanks, >>>>could you please also give me that for the gift is more useful for me"? >>>> >>>> José C. >>> >>>If I would give you my broken TV set, would you take it just because it is a >>>gift? >>> >>>Alessandro >> >> If you give it with good intention, I'd say "thanks Alessandro, could you >>please fix it before giving to me? ;) > >Yes. And this seems to be what Christophe is saying... "thanks but could you >please fix it?" :) > >Cheers, Tim. Yes -- perhaps he just objected to the mode of delivery. :) -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.