Author: Jonathan Schroer
Date: 07:53:04 11/08/98
Go up one level in this thread
Dear Eric, On November 07, 1998 at 13:17:13, Eric Adolph wrote: > >But didn't Rebel 10 beat the crap out of Anand? No, it didn't. Anand lost a few blitz games, with no increment. In at least 1 game, Anand lost on time in a superior position. Anand beat Rebel 1.5-0.5 at the same type of time control that Deeper Blue beat Kasparov 3.5-2.5. Those matches were played at the internationally accepted OTB time control of 2 hours for 40 moves, or something very close to that. >If so, it seems it would have a >good chance vs. Kasparov too, and Kasparov didn't lose to Deep Blue that badly, >except in the last game. So, how big could the difference between Deep Blue and >Rebel 10 really be? (playing strength, not "speed"). "Speed" is playing strength, for computers. If what you mean by playing strength is quality of evaluations, then no one knows, because a 4,000 pound gorilla does not have to evaluate as well as a "RoboSmurf" to outperform it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.