Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 12:52:29 10/13/03
In a thread above Christophe repeated his statement, that there can not be a difference in _relative_ playing strength for short or longer time controls. I disagree and may present at least a hint, that this might not be true for certain engines: Gerhard Sonnabend performed this test: <pre> Chess Tiger 15.0(CB) "Normal" vs WIN-Rebel 12 (Test12a) Stellung No. 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 Total (+ 1/2 -) 5min/game 13.0- 7.0 10.5- 9.5 13.5- 6.5 14.5- 5.5 16.5- 3.5 15.0- 5.0 0 0 83.0-37.0 (68-30-22) 10min/game 15.5- 4.5 13.5- 6.5 13.0- 7.0 13.5- 6.5 11.5- 8.5 13.0- 7.0 0 0 80.0-40.0 (63-34-23) 30min/game 11.0- 9.0 12.5- 7.5 10.0-10.0 9.5-10.5 13.0- 7.0 12.5- 7.5 0 0 68.5-51.5 (48-41-31) 120min/game 10.5- 9.5 10.5- 9.5 12.5- 7.5 11.5- 8.5 11.0- 9.0 9.5-10.5 0 0 65.5-54.5 (41-49-30) </pre> I do not know if there is a statistical sound difference, but at least it looks like Rebel performs better at longer time controls. regards Joachim
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.