Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 03:24:37 10/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2003 at 15:07:38, Russell Reagan wrote: >"Hello Russell, > >I do not think you are correct. A bitboard operation executes so much faster. >This is why virtually all chess programs are bitboard based, and I know of >none that use an array move generator. This is wildly incorrect, but of course you know that as well as I do. >For example, I tested the following position on Zillions and on Vortex that >has just 3 pieces. If you bother to continue the e-mail exchange with the author, please point out that all comparisons with "Zillions of Games" are completely worthless. Of course an engine which plays only a single chess variant will always be much faster and stronger than a general strategic game playing engine where the board size and the rules can be configured by the user. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.