Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Rating List Less Chessmaster? Why?

Author: Dan Ellwein

Date: 18:57:08 10/19/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 19, 2003 at 17:25:45, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On October 19, 2003 at 12:22:15, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On October 19, 2003 at 11:41:21, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>
>>>On October 19, 2003 at 10:37:05, James T. Walker wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 19, 2003 at 10:21:41, Michael P. Nance Sr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On October 19, 2003 at 08:43:30, David H. McClain wrote:

snip

>I don't think that either, it is just the "manual play" prospect that kills the
>CM testing. As much as I can understand that, one on the other hand should
>realize there is a price to pay, the price of losing creditability.
>
>If it is a money issue, I hereby donate a free copy of CM9000 to the SSDF, I am
>sure there are CCC people who want to do the same.
>
>My best,
>
>Ed

I, too, will hereby donate a free copy of CM9000 to the SSDF...

 - Dan

• Re: SSDF Rating List Less Chessmaster? Why? Torstein Hall 13:52:56 10/20/03
  • Re: SSDF Rating List Less Chessmaster? Why? David H. McClain 14:06:56 10/20/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.