Author: Tim Foden
Date: 11:33:26 10/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2003 at 10:44:36, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On October 22, 2003 at 06:33:41, Vladimir Medvedev wrote: > >>I am not sure all these tasks has unique solution (at least two of them are >>incorrect, but I can't remember their numbers :( > >I included a few comments. Most positions have alternative solutions, that yield >in longer mater. > >>Now much can your engine solve at 1 sec/position? >>With/without null-move? > >Only tried with null move. After few corrections Yace found in 87 in 1s, 98 in 5 >s, 92 needed 8 s and 71 10 s. Ah... it took me a while to decifer this Deiter... I couldn't figure out why you were getting fewer solution in more time :) in 1 second Yace found 87 solutions in 5 seconds Yace found 98 solutions additionally, the solution to number 92 needed 8 seconds and the solution to number 71 needed 10 seconds. I ran your corrected positions with GLC... GLC didn't do anywhere near so well with null move switched on... GLC 3.00, null on, 15s/pos, 24MB hash, AXP 2.1GHz: Passed 68 out of 100 (0 invalid) -------------------------------------------- Test run complete 1 0.00 *fail* 0.00 *fail* *fail* 0.00 9.40 *fail* *fail* 0.02 11 1.07 0.73 0.77 0.09 *fail* 0.22 *fail* *fail* 1.03 *fail* 21 0.17 0.16 4.26 *fail* 0.06 1.25 *fail* 3.47 *fail* 0.00 31 0.04 0.03 *fail* 0.17 0.80 *fail* 0.07 0.25 0.19 1.07 41 0.08 *fail* 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.13 0.04 *fail* 0.10 0.09 51 *fail* *fail* *fail* 0.02 *fail* 0.02 0.04 0.02 *fail* 0.00 61 0.02 0.13 0.08 0.03 0.08 0.64 *fail* *fail* *fail* 0.05 71 0.01 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.03 *fail* 0.02 0.02 0.03 81 0.00 0.03 *fail* 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 *fail* 91 0.00 0.00 0.01 *fail* 0.04 *fail* 1.19 *fail* *fail* *fail* ====================================================== Number of solutions found: 68/100 Average time to find solutions: 5.08692 seconds RMS time to find solutions: 8.56005 seconds 1s: 60 +60 |################################################## (88.2%) 2s: 65 +5 |#### (7.4%) 3s: 65 +0 | (0.0%) 4s: 66 +1 |# (1.5%) 5s: 67 +1 |# (1.5%) 6s: 67 +0 | (0.0%) 7s: 67 +0 | (0.0%) 8s: 67 +0 | (0.0%) 9s: 67 +0 | (0.0%) 10s: 68 +1 |# (1.5%) ====================================================== GLC is much more successful with null move switched off... GLC 3.00, null off, same conditions: Passed 99 out of 100 (0 invalid) -------------------------------------------- Test run complete 1 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.02 0.05 *fail* 0.33 0.01 5.06 0.02 11 1.05 0.73 0.75 0.09 0.02 0.23 0.13 4.47 1.01 0.23 21 0.18 0.18 3.23 0.37 0.06 1.69 0.06 3.60 1.33 0.01 31 0.04 0.03 0.10 0.13 0.35 0.12 0.06 0.16 0.15 0.02 41 0.08 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.03 0.15 0.11 0.09 51 0.01 0.07 0.14 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.00 61 0.02 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.04 71 0.01 0.11 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 81 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 ====================================================== Number of solutions found: 99/100 Average time to find solutions: 0.432 seconds RMS time to find solutions: 1.73964 seconds 1s: 91 +91 |################################################## (91.9%) 2s: 95 +4 |## (4.0%) 3s: 95 +0 | (0.0%) 4s: 97 +2 |# (2.0%) 5s: 98 +1 |# (1.0%) 6s: 99 +1 |# (1.0%) ====================================================== Below is the single failure... looks like Rh6 may be a shorter mate... [d]6b1/4Kpk1/5r2/8/3B2P1/7R/8/8 w - - bm Bxf6+; id "Loyd-095; #7"; Line 006: Test [Bxf6+]... Game stage: Endgame Current eval: 0.209 Ply Time Score Nodes Principal variation 4 0.010 +9.621 6067 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh8 Bh7 3. g5 Bg8 4. Rxg8+ 5 0.010 +9.621 9616 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh8 Bh7 3. g5 {ht} 5 0.020 +9.621 20935 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh8 Bh7 3. g5 {ht} 6 0.020 +10.021 20964 Bxf6+ {++} Kg6 2. Rh8 Bh7 3. g5 Bg8 4. Rxg8+ Kf5 5. Kxf7 6 0.030 +Mate07 47868 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh5 Bh7 3. Rg5+ Kh6 4. Kxf7 Bg6+ 5. Rxg6+ Kh7 6. Bh4 Kh8 7. Rh6# 6 0.040 +Mate07 66201 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh5 Bh7 3. Rg5+ Kh6 4. Kxf7 Bg6+ 5. Rxg6+ Kh7 6. Bh4 Kh8 7. Rh6# 7 0.070 +Mate07 116236 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh5 Bh7 3. Rg5+ Kh6 4. Kxf7 Bg6+ 5. Rxg6+ Kh7 6. Bh4 Kh8 7. Rh6# 7 0.110 +Mate07 214398 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh5 Bh7 3. Rg5+ Kh6 4. Kxf7 Bg6+ 5. Rxg6+ Kh7 6. Bh4 Kh8 7. Rh6# 8 0.221 +Mate07 443074 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh5 Bh7 3. Rg5+ Kh6 4. Kxf7 Bg6+ 5. Rxg6+ Kh7 6. Bh4 Kh8 7. Rh6# {ht} 8 0.301 +Mate07 613115 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh5 Bh7 3. Rg5+ Kh6 4. Kxf7 Bg6+ 5. Rxg6+ Kh7 6. Bh4 Kh8 7. Rh6# {ht} 9 0.531 +Mate07 1038732 Bxf6+ Kg6 2. Rh5 Bh7 3. Rg5+ Kh6 4. Kxf7 Bg6+ 5. Rxg6+ Kh7 6. Bh4 Kh8 7. Rh6# {ht} 9 0.821 +Mate05 1671852 Rh6 Kxh6 2. Kxf6 Kh7 3. g5 Kh8 4. g6 fxg6 5. Kxg6# 9 0.831 +Mate05 1697846 Rh6 Kxh6 2. Kxf6 Kh7 3. g5 Kh8 4. g6 fxg6 5. Kxg6# 10 0.841 +Mate05 1703572 Rh6 Kxh6 2. Kxf6 Kh7 3. g5 Kh8 4. g6 fxg6 5. Kxg6# 10 1.062 +Mate05 2220314 Rh6 Kxh6 2. Kxf6 Kh7 3. g5 Kh8 4. g6 fxg6 5. Kxg6# local: t= 1.062 nps=2090690.6 n=2220314 (34.7% / 65.3%) total: t=1:45.96 nps=1853825.7 n=196438775 stats: fh=99.8%/0.15%/0.038% draws=5330 trans: probes=570270 hits=413833 (72.57%) draft=269473 (47.25%) tcuts: exact=65 (0.01%) upper=243278 (42.66%) lower=23917 (4.19%) tstor: exact=116 (0.04%) upper=198285 (65.44%) lower=104609 (34.52%) ext: check=125135 recap=590 ppush=343 1rep=1975 thrt=0 q-moves: gen=1722 tested=1248 made/un=65 max-dep=1 max eval diff: part-1=0.424 part-2=1.145 -------------------------------------------- 6b1/4Kpk1/5r2/8/3B2P1/7R/8/8 w - - bm Bxf6+; id "Loyd-095; #7"; Line 006: Test [Bxf6+]: failed [Rh6; score=320.991] Passed 5 out of 6 (0 invalid) -------------------------------------------- Cheers, Tim.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.