Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Happy to know Ruffian will become commercial, because....

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 21:29:48 10/22/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 22, 2003 at 23:33:52, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On October 22, 2003 at 16:47:22, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 22, 2003 at 16:28:33, Matthew Hull wrote:
>>
>>>On October 22, 2003 at 14:16:15, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>>
>>>>...because then I have some assurance I will get some even strongers engines in
>>>>the future. Why should this guy keep giving us gold for nothing?
>>>>We are talking, probably, of around 30 bucks. Not the big deal. Sure the guys
>>>>crying here expend lot more sipping beer just one saturday night.
>>>>Fernando
>>>
>>>I personally cannot see that $30 will get you better answers, or better games
>>>than fine engines like crafty, especially considering that nobody around here is
>>>a even an IM.
>>
>>Totally irrelevant.
>>
>>By the same logic you can say that you do not see a reason to buy faster cars
>>when nobody here has chances to run even only faster than the old cars.
>>
>>>
>>>It's a bit like paying $200 bucks for Windows when Linux can be had for $5.
>>
>>Linux does not give the same things.
>>
>>People complain that they cannot run most of the chess software on Linux and
>>chess software is not the only problem.
>>
>>Maybe if some good programmer can write a program that translate every source
>>code for programs that run under windows to equivalent source code that run
>>under linux things may be different.
>
>
>
>There is no need for this.
>
>I can run the commercial Windows version of Chess Tiger on my Linux notebook,
>together with 99% of Windows software.
>
>There are several products that allow you to do that:
>* Win4lin (the one I am using)
>* VMWare
>* Wine (free)
>* Xen (free; not ready at this time, but promising)
>
>These products are good enough for me, until I get rid of all Windows software
>(almost done).
>
>The next step is to write code that is portable between Windows and Linux, and
>I'm working on this also for the softwares I have developped. It is not that
>difficult and testing your code under two different OSes will make it rock
>solid.
>
>    Christophe


I cannot see the sense in using Linux when you run a windows emulator and use
(original) windows programs. IMO it would make sense if there were only few
windows programs you use, but when it is more than 50% original Windows software
you use, the Linux usage indeed makes - for me - no sense.




This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.