Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF and the autoplayer

Author: Mark Young

Date: 00:52:13 11/10/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 1998 at 03:31:48, Ed Schröder wrote:

>>>Some people need a long time to do something normal.
>>>ChessBase took months to decide something that is obvious.
>>>The damage that they have done to computerchess is IMO very big.
>>>and cannot be taken back soon.
>
>>I hope that some kind of revenge factor does not play into Ed’s decision when to
>>put auto player support back into Rebel 10. He has enough pissed off customers
>>as it is, and the sooner we can put this mess behind us the better. I know that
>>some programmers do not care about their customer base, but I think that Ed
>>does, and I hope he will do the right thing A.S.A.P. Because it is not SSDF that
>>pays the bills, it is his customer base.
>
>I can assure you no revenge or similar feelings are involved in my decision. I
>just have practical objections.
>
>As you all know I have argued against hidden autoplayers. This from February
>till August/September. In public as well in email with the SSDF. I then dropped
>the whole issue as no compromise was hanging in the air as the SSDF rejected
>my wish to exclude hidden autoplayers for future testing.
>
>So Rebel10 was released without auto232 based on the above.
>
>I am not prepared to make a patch for a) reasons of time b) costs.

No way to put a download on your site to give autoplayer support to Rebel10,
I am not a programmer so I don't know, but if this is done no need to trash the
CDroms if you can just upgrade them after the install.

I don't know how much time it would take to do this if you wanted to, or how
much it would cost you. So I will have to take your word that it can't be done
for the reason you give, and I will accept it. :(


>
>I am not prepared to trash all Rebel10 cdroms in my office. I am not
>prepared to make costs for a new master and have the thing duplicated
>another xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx times because it took the SSDF 8-9 months to
>come to the same conclusion I have argued for so long. The (good) news
>just came one month too late.
>
>- Ed -



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.