Author: Bert Seifriz
Date: 02:08:17 11/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 1998 at 03:31:48, Ed Schröder wrote: >>some programmers do not care about their customer base, but I think that Ed >>does, and I hope he will do the right thing A.S.A.P. Because it is not SSDF that >>pays the bills, it is his customer base. > >I can assure you no revenge or similar feelings are involved in my decision. I >just have practical objections. > >As you all know I have argued against hidden autoplayers. This from February >till August/September. In public as well in email with the SSDF. I then dropped >the whole issue as no compromise was hanging in the air as the SSDF rejected >my wish to exclude hidden autoplayers for future testing. > >So Rebel10 was released without auto232 based on the above. > >I am not prepared to make a patch for a) reasons of time b) costs. > >I am not prepared to trash all Rebel10 cdroms in my office. I am not >prepared to make costs for a new master and have the thing duplicated >another xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx times because it took the SSDF 8-9 months to >come to the same conclusion I have argued for so long. The (good) news >just came one month too late. > >- Ed - Hi, I have a FEELING that the autoplayer is right on the Rebel 10 CD. Just find the right input you guys and it will open up. New CDs are not necessary. A small patch on the REBEL homepage would certainly also do. Bert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.