Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 07:46:54 11/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 1998 at 23:56:24, Detlef Pordzik wrote: >On November 09, 1998 at 08:59:19, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >>Looking at the lastest SSDF rankings I was wondering where CM5500 was, the only >>ones they have are CM5000 ranked 26th then CM4000 at 51st. >> >>Can someone please tell me why even though CM6000 is very new, why there is no >>mention to adding it in the December ratings and CM5500 was not tested at all. >>and that program has been out for a while. I find the SSDF ratings very >>incomplete. and mis-guiding. >> >>If someone can answer why the most bought chess program versions in the world >>are not tested then I would like to know why please. > >While printing the new SSDF list I recognized something similar and asked Mr. >Karlsson in a email concerning this today. > >I doubt, I'll get an answer. >" No autoplayer " is absolutely no reason for my opinion, not to test a brandnew >product of this value. I am sure you are welcome as a SSDF member. If you want to play a few hundred manual games with CM6000, please go ahead, and the program will be included on the list. If you have better ways to spend your time, please stop complaining. >As weather de Koning nor Distributor Mindscape have the slightest lobby down >there, nobody will have a look at the settings, that make sense. So, if at all, >CM will be sent into games with the standard settings - of 1 MB Hash tables - >against progs who refuse to start below 48 MB. >But, as said, they didn't care the least about this in the CM 5.000 Vs - they >didn't even use CM 5.500 - why should they use CM 6.000 at all ? Why should they use CM5500? The engine and opening book is the same as in CM5000. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.