Author: martin fierz
Date: 15:23:41 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 15:12:35, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On October 31, 2003 at 05:14:03, martin fierz wrote: > >>On October 30, 2003 at 16:27:18, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >>BTW you mention that you do hashing in QS in yace. since i don't do this in my >>program: how much does this help? should i try? (of course the answer to this >>question is yes, as one should always try... but how much in % would you >>estimate that you gain by using hash in QS?) > >Sorry, I have no estimate in % anymore. I did test it, however. First I was >surprised that using hash in QS will help even in situations where the HT is >totally overfilled (long searches). I guess, it might have to do with the fact, >that I don't use SEE. So the benifit might be bigger than in an engine that uses >SEE. interesting stuff. my program has no SEE either - i always get a headache when i try to think how to do it :-) so i'll have to try that hashing in QS thing, specially since christophe just wrote that getting one's QS right is 30% of the effort spent on creating a good chess program... cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.