Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 08:34:21 11/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 03, 2003 at 11:12:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 03, 2003 at 10:21:14, Johan Hutting wrote: > >>On November 03, 2003 at 10:13:58, Johan Hutting wrote: >> >>>On November 03, 2003 at 10:08:08, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>He was banned for 1 month because of his bad behaviour. >>>>He attacked me in his posts and I complained about it. >> >><snip> >>On a more serious note, I seem to recall you claiming you would not respond to >>his post in the future due to his behaviour. I do this as well with some of the >>trolls in this group. I also don't bother reading their posts so I won't be >>tempted to reply :) >> >>If this is the reason IMHO it's a bit over the top. Both Hyatt and Diepeveen >>would have been banned ages ago if this is the reason > > >I don't think you have seen me call anyone here a "fucking idiot". Or >an "old idiot". About 90% of Vincent's posts could be deleted and there >would be no loss of information. He could do better if he _wanted_ to. > >Apparently he doesn't. Vincent is not a professor or doctor, he's very spontaneous, I wished many had his marvelous motivation he has with his Diep who's such a pain still now. I read here many things that sound as if everybody would be happy if Vincent were off the field. Is it really true that he does only write 10% interesting stuff? Didn't he give you almost always the occasion to make important explanations? Then how should he be evaluated??? I think way better than Mister 10%. We have enough successful authors who don't talk at all. And CC isn't a hen coop, no? ;)) Rolf > > > >>:P Anyway, I'm not that >>bothered with the validity of the ban, more with the behaviour of the >>moderators. >> >>Regards, >>Johan.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.