Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Looks like a Crafty problem to me...

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 23:32:40 11/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 2003 at 23:22:53, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>So, are you saying it needs special NUMA code to get 'full' bandwidth and that
>it defaults to a single memory channel? Running Windows 2k, XP, and other SMP
>operating systems the Opteron *always* gets the full memory bandwidth across
>all of its cpus. Hardware test pages ran all kinds of reviews/tests and every
>single one showed a dual/quad pulls a ridiculous amount of bandwidth. Remove
>the chips and it goes back down accordingly.

Such a test doesn't necessarily paint the whole picture. I think that
Crafty basically shows while Opteron is a great processor, it's still
best to shy away from it's worst case situations, or you might get
suboptimal results.

>This looks like a Crafty problem, NOT an Opteron problem. Why test software >that already has problems? Those speedup numbers for 2 cpus are identical to
>the dual Athlon numbers.. which crafty also had problems with. Try Deep Sjeng
>for example, see how that turns out. I'm sure Gian would send it to you for
>speed-testing most likely if you don't have it already. I'd be willing to bet
>the Opteron mops up the Xeons as I mentioned before. Want to give it a shot, at
>least until Crafty is working properly?

Already did that, Deep Sjeng _flies_ on (Quad) Opterons, but the design
is very different from Crafty.

--
GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.