Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 23:40:15 11/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 02:31:40, Andre van Ark wrote: > > >Yes, it is true Vincent could analyse this games quite well. > >But he is banned..... > >Mainly because he called a certain person "an old idiot" > >And some people like to throw with nud on Vincent, even while he isn't able to >defend himself. > >Who should be banned ? > >Kind regards >André van Ark Either you haven't been here that long, or you just haven't read his previous posts. I would bet my ex-wife and a bag of chips that Vincent would indeed state that Kaspy played like a 2000 rated patzer. It has happened time and time again. In fact here is a few tells from channel 64 on ICC during the first game: Diep(C)(64): i am only here for a few minutes. this game is of no interest to me. Diep(C)(64): playing a weak opening vs a computer is stupid Diep(C)(64): already i can see it will be draw Diep(C)(64): diep can draw this blindfolded As you can see Diep should be in this match rather than Fritz... Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.