Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Who should be banned ?

Author: Peter Skinner

Date: 23:40:15 11/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 14, 2003 at 02:31:40, Andre van Ark wrote:

>
>
>Yes, it is true Vincent could analyse this games quite well.
>
>But he is banned.....
>
>Mainly because he called a certain person "an old idiot"
>
>And some people like to throw with nud on Vincent, even while he isn't able to
>defend himself.
>
>Who should be banned ?
>
>Kind regards
>André van Ark

Either you haven't been here that long, or you just haven't read his previous
posts. I would bet my ex-wife and a bag of chips that Vincent would indeed state
that Kaspy played like a 2000 rated patzer. It has happened time and time again.
In fact here is a few tells from channel 64 on ICC during the first game:

Diep(C)(64): i am only here for a few minutes. this game is of no interest to
me.
Diep(C)(64): playing a weak opening vs a computer is stupid
Diep(C)(64): already i can see it will be draw
Diep(C)(64): diep can draw this blindfolded

As you can see Diep should be in this match rather than Fritz...

Peter



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.