Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 07:44:32 11/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 2003 at 08:02:04, steven blincoe wrote: > >> >>But you haven't included any of his great achievments, and the list is very >>long! >> >>BTW no one becomes as _great_ as Kasparov, if they didn't _love_ the game! >> >>Yes money plays a role, it does for _all_ GM's and IM's but to be the best, >>money alone can't get you there, that's a fact! > >love of game,being great,dedication ,etc,etc has nothing to do with his being >noble >the man is not noble,not even close >and yes ,i could go on and on,siting more examples of his boorish ,less then >generous,poor loser behaviour , because the record of his less then noble >actions is about as long as the list of his chess victories > > > > >> >>Is your "Weeds" and "Thorns" analysis noble? >> >>No, it's not! > >no its certainly not noble, but i do not claim that my comments about Kasparov >are noble..they are only the truth. > >his noble actions were actually sited as reason alone for his deserving to play >Fritz yet again > >i think not.. >Steve Forget all that, he still has the right and the chess world mostly agrees, whether he's a scoundrel or a saint, it makes no difference. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.