Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:25:33 11/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 2003 at 07:43:15, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On November 18, 2003 at 07:26:12, Albert Silver wrote: > >[snip] > >>Of course, you're correct that they could easily have played out a few more >>moves. In fact, I would agree with you. Not because I think GK is bound to make >>a mistake and put the result in doubt, I honestly don't for a second, but >>because this is a very public display, and as has correctly become fashionable: >>even if the result is crystal clear to the GMs playing, they play it until it >>is crystal clear to the spectators. > >That's something I don't quite understand. From a marketing POV it would be very >important and also very simple to continue with the game until it's crystal >clear to the average spectator. > >The way it is it could drive off some spectators because they didn't really >understand why Fritz (or the team) resigned. From a marketing POV a clear >failure in my opinion. > >Sargon And it gives new life to "the conspiracy theorists"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.