Author: margolies,marc
Date: 14:42:58 11/27/03
These are not charges based upon LIST's <<performance>> in a direct way--Although all of LIST's defenders offer counter-proof regarding different performance characteristics between Crafty and LIST. The charge is PLAGIARISM-- lifting of (some)code. The Programmer in question has not responded to the commitee's request for proof with a defense (according to Levy's Report--I have no direct knowledge) therefore the Commitee had to act to protect the legitimacy of the Tournament. Also the commitee's action were a response to a complaint by an (unnamed) tournament participant who has standing to do so.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.