Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Having Read David Levy's Charges about LIST>>>

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 15:12:48 11/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 27, 2003 at 18:04:56, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On November 27, 2003 at 17:55:19, Bob Durrett wrote:
>
>>On November 27, 2003 at 17:42:58, margolies,marc wrote:
>>
>>>These are not charges based upon LIST's <<performance>> in a direct
>>>way--Although all of LIST's defenders offer counter-proof regarding different
>>>performance characteristics between Crafty and LIST.
>>>The charge is PLAGIARISM-- lifting of (some)code. The Programmer in question has
>>>not responded to the commitee's request for proof with a defense (according to
>>>Levy's Report--I have no direct knowledge) therefore the Commitee had to act to
>>>protect the legitimacy of the Tournament. Also the commitee's action were a
>>>response to a complaint by an (unnamed) tournament participant who has standing
>>>to do so.
>>
>>The "committee" has no legal authority.  Plagiarism is a violation of law, at
>>least in some Countries.  The individual suffering damages from plagiarism can
>>seek and obtain compensation in a duly constituted Civil Court of Law. The
>>"committee" is NOT a Court of Law.  They have no business trying to pretend
>>otherwise.  They run risks by their own actions.  They have no authority to
>>judge and punish someone for a law violation and they have no authority to
>>create their own laws either.  In other words, this "committee" has put itself
>>out on a very fragile limb.  Let's just hope that the programmer has a very good
>>sense of humor.
>>
>>Bob D.
>
>Sorry Bob, but you don't know what you're talking about. The ICGA does have the
>legal authority to expel List, if the author doesn't meet his or her
>obligations.
>
>They _are_ entitled to view the source code, and the participants know this.
>
>Since the author of List didn't return their messages by the deadline, the ICGA
>must enforce the rules, no exceptions.
>
>Terry

Well, there's always two sides to every coin.  If I am wrong it wouldn't be the
first time!  : )

I really hate it when organizers try to impose unreasonable rules.  It is one of
my hangups.  Sorry to burden every one else with my pet peeves.  : (

Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.