Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 18:35:54 11/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2003 at 21:24:50, margolies,marc wrote: >I wouldn't keep playing up this 'circumstancial evidence' phrase. It is sounding >over-ripe. >What kinds of evidence might you expect to be actionable? A confession--not >available. A thorough examination of source code-- not available. >If you have some other form of evidence-- since ICGA is supplying the >equipment--possibly a heap dump (could be the reason to allow LIST to play an >extra round) i do not know what might be not refered to as circumstancial as all >ideas are inferred from circumstances at the event. Maybe someone went through the extremely difficult task, possibly automated, of recreating the source code from the executable????? Seems not too likely. Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.