Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:03:12 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2003 at 05:59:30, martin fierz wrote: >On December 01, 2003 at 04:43:04, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On December 01, 2003 at 04:20:55, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>On November 30, 2003 at 22:42:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>>It was handled _poorly_. The author's reputation is ruined no matter what >>>>happens. Were it me, I'd be contacting my attorney and ICGA would be >>>>taking out a huge loan or going bankrupt... >>> >>>forget it - the ICGA can run it's tournaments as it likes. the rules are clear, >>>they can demand to inspect your code. it doesn't matter why they demand to >>>inspect your code, they have the right to do so. if you don't show your code, >>>they have the right to throw you out of the tournament. >> >>How about some moral obligation to protect young people from making a mistake >>wich, as they most likely don't realise, could haunt them for a very long time ? >> >>We're not talking about something he'll get over with in a couple of days. >> >>Tony > >i was answering bob's (very american) idea of dragging the ICGA to court for >what happened. as i *also* wrote, i don't like the way things were handled. one >thing has nothing to do with the other though. there is no court case here, >that's what i meant to say. > >cheers > martin > Look at the definitions for libel. slander, and reputation. His reputation has been badly damaged. If it was unjust, look out. > > >> >>> >>>i'm not saying i like what happenend, but there is nothing to sue for here. >>> >>>cheers >>> martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.