Author: Amir Ban
Date: 15:50:23 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2003 at 09:48:34, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >On November 30, 2003 at 09:26:11, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On November 30, 2003 at 08:58:10, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >> >>>The "main" point is IMHO that Jonny and Shredder didn't implement the correct >>>knowledge, but the fritz-gui, Jonny was playing with. >>>I guess there was no explicite rule about the issue, if engine and external >>>interface disagree. IMHO the engine is the boss here. >>> >>>Gerd >> >>Gerd, when the GUI shows the draw, and complains, even values the game >>1/2-1/2 the operator has to stand up and search for the TD. > >Yes. > >>if the TD is not coming, and when he comes he still don't understands, >>and after the game in the discussion still is not understanding what is going >>on, >>it is the operator and the TD that are in charge . > >Yes very "unlucky", but IMHO the final TD decision was right! > >> >>The operator cannot make another move or another decision than the programs. >> >>he is not the boss, the program is. > >There is no atomic program. >There is the Jonny engine and the fritz-gui. They disagree. The gui reports draw >but did allow to play on. I interprete gui output, message box or whatever, as >an option for the operator to claim a draw according to the rules. > >He should claim the draw if his engine agrees. >But because Jonny had no clue about the draw, >it is the correct decision to play on. > >Gerd You are confusing between what happened at Graz and what people on the Internet said later to justify it. The question of whether it was interface or engine was never considered by the TD. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.