Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 00:40:54 11/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 1998 at 21:07:53, Peter McKenzie wrote: >On November 16, 1998 at 14:50:57, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>r1r1q1k1/6p1/p2b1p1p/1p1PpP2/PPp5/2P4P/R1B2QP1/R5K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>It has been contended that this move would be difficult for a computer to find, >>and this has caused some doubts to be raised as to whether the computer found it >>without assistance in this game. >> >>I would like to ask how we can clear this up absent input from DB. >> >>Has anybody run this for a long period on a micro, and if so, was any move >>selected other than 35. Qb6? I let go CM6000 on this for 24hrs and when I last looked it liked Qb6, but axb5 was favoured for a short time but then went back to Qb6, I did find though under less analysed conditions running CM6000 at 40/2, I did get an axb5 move.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.