Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 11:25:30 12/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2003 at 12:51:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: [snip] guess Robert means read(). As said above, I would prefer Standard C functions >>(if possible). read() is not a Standard C function. > >I'm not sure what that means. read() is in every C implementation I have >ever used. As are the others such as getc/putc, gets/puts, scanf/printf, >fread/fwrite, read/write, etc... read/write are specifically non-buffered >calls, and they even worked on MSDOS just fine. getc() etc conform to ANSI-C and POSIX.1. read() etc conform to SVr4, SVID, AT&T, POSIX, X/OPEN, BSD 4.3 (but not ANSI-C) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.