Author: martin fierz
Date: 08:27:13 12/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2003 at 11:07:25, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On December 08, 2003 at 10:56:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 08, 2003 at 10:42:01, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>>On December 08, 2003 at 01:35:02, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On December 08, 2003 at 01:24:46, Steve Lim wrote: >>>> >>>>He's on vacation. Won't be anymore games for like another week. >>> >>>What's the result so far? (and what exactly was the time control?) >> >> >>The first test-match was at roughly 10:1 time odds. I don't remember >>the draws (I think 5) but the win/lose score is 4:2 so far in Crafty's >>favor, if I didn't miss a result. > >1 minute is just a pure tactical combat. A fair 10 to 1 time control would be >100 minutes to 10 minutes, or even 50 minutes to 5 minutes... the time control is some standard time control, perhaps 2h/40 + 1h/rest or 90 minutes + 30' increment, for both programs. but crafty is running on a fast new computer while junior is running on an old computer which is about 10x slower. i would expect that keeping the time odds constant at 10:1, increasing the time control would favor the program with less time and more knowledge. perhaps i should test this once, should be rather simple. cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.