Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Hard test position - Yace seems the best!

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 10:52:17 12/08/03

Go up one level in this thread

On December 08, 2003 at 13:40:17, Mihaly Szalai wrote:

>That is strange. I was able to reproduce your Yace result under Arena,
>but under the Fritz GUI with the wb2uci adapter Yace is much slower.
>(Only Depth 17 in 12 minutes.)
>(Celeron 1.7 GHz, 64 MB hash.)

Strange. Can you reproduce this under Fritz? If yes, can you please show me the
log file? Add a line

log strange.log

to yace.ini. Start the analysis for 2 minutes or so, and quit the engine again.
Then show the contents of strange.log (you can open it with any editor - for
example with notepad).

Was Yace running as WB-engine or as UCI-engine under Arena?

Note, that there should be no need to use wb2uci for Yace, but it should of
course still work with it.

Regards,
Dieter

• Re: Hard test position - Yace seems the best! Mihaly Szalai 11:26:14 12/08/03
  • Re: Hard test position - Yace seems the best! Dieter Buerssner 11:43:28 12/08/03
  • Re: Hard test position - Yace seems the best! Dieter Buerssner 11:36:52 12/08/03
    • Re: Hard test position - Yace seems the best! Mihaly Szalai 11:41:54 12/08/03
• Re: Hard test position - Yace seems the best! Richard Pijl 11:09:39 12/08/03
  • Re: Hard test position - Yace seems the best! Dieter Buerssner 11:14:16 12/08/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.