Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:55:45 12/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2003 at 07:05:46, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On December 08, 2003 at 11:35:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 08, 2003 at 11:07:25, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>>On December 08, 2003 at 10:56:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On December 08, 2003 at 10:42:01, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 08, 2003 at 01:35:02, Slater Wold wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 08, 2003 at 01:24:46, Steve Lim wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>He's on vacation. Won't be anymore games for like another week. >>>>> >>>>>What's the result so far? (and what exactly was the time control?) >>>> >>>> >>>>The first test-match was at roughly 10:1 time odds. I don't remember >>>>the draws (I think 5) but the win/lose score is 4:2 so far in Crafty's >>>>favor, if I didn't miss a result. >>> >>>1 minute is just a pure tactical combat. A fair 10 to 1 time control would be >>>100 minutes to 10 minutes, or even 50 minutes to 5 minutes... >> >> >>The games are 40 moves in 2 hours. DJ is simply running on a machine 10x >>slower. > >10x faster machine is a bigger adavantage than 10x more time. >José. Exactly why? (hint: think about it. They are _exactly_ the same thing. In 10x time handicap matches, we play with ponder=off. there is no difference between 10x faster and 10x longer in that logical context.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.