Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:01:31 12/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2003 at 11:28:45, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On December 08, 2003 at 21:08:14, Slater Wold wrote: > >>2 things... >> >>tabsnet has *no* itanium results. They don't even have a category for it. >> >>I have been told that the results from 'Slowpoke' have been verified. And was >>verified back in March when he originally posted them (because that smoked >>everyone back then). And since you couldn't see it, I'll spoil it for you, the >>I2 1.0Ghz did the bench in 11:07. > >Thats nice but... what exactly is Leen Ammeraal going to do with an Itanium 2? >He specifically asked about the FX and P4-3.2EE. I'm pretty sure he is going to >want to stick to x86 chips. Sure, the I2 can emulate IA-32 and it does emulate >it better than the old I1.. but it is still slow at IA-32 stuff. Not to mention all the assembly stuff we post about here is 100% useless when talking about Itanium. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.