Author: blass uri
Date: 05:23:06 11/21/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 1998 at 07:46:16, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On November 20, 1998 at 17:39:03, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Hello, >>For anyone interested: >> >>This is game #10 of my 12 game match. Chessmaster was kicked out of book on the >>2nd move. I think Rebel was out of book on either move 3 or 4. Very strange >>opening. Chessmaster called the mate in 6. The score is now 5-5 with two more >>games to go. >> >>Chessmaster now running on AMD K6-2 @350 MHZ 64 Meg hash. >>Rebel 10.0 now running on PII @333 mhz 100 Meg hash. >> >>[Event "40/90"] >>[Site "FL"] >>[Date "1998.11.20"] >>[Round "10"] >>[White "REBEL 10.0"] >>[Black "CM5500"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[WhiteElo "2552"] >>[BlackElo "2550"] >>[ECO "D00"] >> >>1. d4 d5 2. Bg5 Nc6 3. Nf3 f6 4. Bf4 g5 5. Bg3 g4 6. Ng1 e5 7. dxe5 fxe5 >>8. e4 Nf6 9. Bh4 Qd6 10. Bxf6 Qxf6 11. exd5 Bc5 12. Qd2 Nb4 13. Nc3 Bf5 >>14. Rc1 O-O 15. Na4 Qd6 16. Nxc5 Qxc5 17. c4 Nxa2 18. Rd1 Nb4 19. Rc1 Rae8 >>20. Rc3 e4 21. h3 e3 22. fxe3 Rxe3+ 23. Rxe3 Nc2+ 24. Ke2 Qxc4+ 25. Rd3 >>Bxd3+ 26. Qxd3 Qf4 27. Kd1 Ne3+ 28. Kc1 Nxg2+ 29. Kd1 Ne3+ 30. Kc1 Qxf1+ >>31. Qxf1 Rxf1+ 32. Kd2 Nf5 33. hxg4 Ng3 34. Rh3 Rxg1 35. Ke3 Rg2 36. Kf4 >>Nf1 37. Rb3 Rf2+ 38. Ke5 b6 39. Rc3 Rf7 40. d6 cxd6+ 41. Kxd6 Kg7 42. Ke5 >>Nh2 43. Rc4 Kh6 44. Ke6 Rg7 45. Kf5 Rg5+ 46. Ke6 Nxg4 47. Ra4 Rg7 48. Kf5 >>Kh5 49. Ra1 Rf7+ 50. Ke6 Kg6 51. Ra3 h5 52. Rg3 Rf6+ 53. Kd5 Kg5 54. Ra3 >>a5 55. Rh3 h4 56. Rh1 Rh6 57. b4 h3 58. bxa5 bxa5 59. Kc4 Kh4 60. Ra1 Rh5 >>61. Kb3 Nf2 62. Ra4+ Kg3 63. Ra3 h2 64. Kc4+ Kg2 65. Ra1 a4 66. Kb4 Rh4+ >>67. Ka3 h1=Q 68. Rxh1 Kxh1 69. Kb2 Rc4 70. Ka2 Nd3 71. Ka3 Kg2 72. Ka2 >>Rc1 73. Ka3 Ra1# 0-1 >> >>Jim Walker > >I think alot of people underestimate CM5500 and also now CM6000, If these games >played against Rebel show how good the CM5500 chess engine is, I can only >imagine how strong the new CM6000 program must be. > >People can come on here and say, yes CM6000 is strong but it could not compete >with the likes of Rebel 10 or Fritz, well until there is some thorough testing >to show just how strong or weak CM6000 is, I am going to come out and say that >it is in the top three of chess program on the market today. > >I know there are quite a few people sitting there thinking, rubbish, No way. But >I CM6000 has, well pretty much flogged all freeware programs at 40/2 time that I >have played manually. And I have loaned a friend my copy of CM6000 and he is in >the process of playing Fritz, at 40/2 hrs and then going to play a 5 minute >series of matches, So far in the 40/2 hrs, CM6000 is leading 3.5-2.5 over Fritz. what is the hardware in this match? > >I am trying to get my hands on the games to post, but so far my money is on >CM6000, to give a whipping to Number 1 Fritz. I think that the number 1 of fritz5 is not justified even in the ssdf games. Junior5 should be number 1 in the ssdf games because we should delete 4 games of Rebel8(p90) against Junior(p200) when Junior lost 2.5:1.5 because Junior was slowed down by a big factor. Pentium200MMX is also optimized for fritz5 and not for Junior5 and Junior can earn more speed from the newest pentiums than fritz5. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.