Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 13:03:44 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 15:49:14, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 15:21:57, Tord Romstad wrote: > >>On December 15, 2003 at 13:58:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>Number of tests: 183 >>>Max score: 183 >>>Engines score: 165 >>>Number with full score: 165 >>>Found in: 1 sec = 28, 2 sec = 11, 5 sec = 29, 10 sec = 20, 30 sec = 30, 1 min = >>>9, 2 min = 12, 5 min = 17, 10 min = 4, 30 min = 5, >>>Time used for tests (wrong answer=900s): 27361s >>> >>>Positions with error (id): >>>ECM.1068, ECM.1197, ECM.1204, ECM.1217, ECM.1227, >>>ECM.1229, ECM.1265, ECM.1273, ECM.1294, ECM.1308, ECM.1314, >>>ECM.1438, ECM.1533, ECM.1592, ECM.1612, ECM.1617, ECM.1621, >>>ECM.1622 >> >>Thanks for the results, Dann! It looks slightly disappointing, even >>considering the slow hardware. The results for Gothmog 0.4.2g on a Pentium >>IV 2.4 GHz: >> >>Found in: 1 sec = 72, 2 sec = 22, 5 sec = 26, 10 sec = 13, 30 sec = 15 >> >>I've never found the patience to run the test with more than 30 seconds >>per position. > >At 30 seconds, you solve 148. Your machine is about 3 times as fast as the one >I am using. > >So your results are about the same as crafty's: >149 at 2 min is the closest measure to your score. You seem to solve some >faster initially. > >If you have a weekend of machine time, I would be interested to know how your >program does given 15 minutes per position. The result of Gothmog is very >impressive to me. P4 2.4 is _maybe_ twice as fast as an Athlon 1 G. I'd put it at about 1.8 . . . anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.