Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 14:06:43 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 15:49:14, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 15:21:57, Tord Romstad wrote: >> >>Thanks for the results, Dann! It looks slightly disappointing, even >>considering the slow hardware. The results for Gothmog 0.4.2g on a Pentium >>IV 2.4 GHz: >> >>Found in: 1 sec = 72, 2 sec = 22, 5 sec = 26, 10 sec = 13, 30 sec = 15 >> >>I've never found the patience to run the test with more than 30 seconds >>per position. > >At 30 seconds, you solve 148. Your machine is about 3 times as fast as the one >I am using. Probably not quite as much, as Anthony has pointed out. >So your results are about the same as crafty's: Yes, but my engine is about 4 times slower than Crafty, and at least 250 rating points weaker (currently 2914 vs 2661 in blitz rating on ICC). >149 at 2 min is the closest measure to your score. You seem to solve some >faster initially. I've noticed that this is quite common for Gothmog. It solves many tactics instantly, but those which are not found instantly are often not found at all, even after an hour of thinking. I'm not sure why this happens; my best guess is that it is caused by aggressive forward pruning. >If you have a weekend of machine time, I would be interested to know how your >program does given 15 minutes per position. I should be able to do it some time during Christmas, I think. >The result of Gothmog is very impressive to me. Thanks, but I don't think you would be impressed if you had seen it play a full game. :-) Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.