Author: martin fierz
Date: 22:56:16 12/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2003 at 16:08:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 15, 2003 at 16:03:44, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>On December 15, 2003 at 15:49:14, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On December 15, 2003 at 15:21:57, Tord Romstad wrote: >>> >>>>On December 15, 2003 at 13:58:02, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>Number of tests: 183 >>>>>Max score: 183 >>>>>Engines score: 165 >>>>>Number with full score: 165 >>>>>Found in: 1 sec = 28, 2 sec = 11, 5 sec = 29, 10 sec = 20, 30 sec = 30, 1 min = >>>>>9, 2 min = 12, 5 min = 17, 10 min = 4, 30 min = 5, >>>>>Time used for tests (wrong answer=900s): 27361s >>>>> >>>>>Positions with error (id): >>>>>ECM.1068, ECM.1197, ECM.1204, ECM.1217, ECM.1227, >>>>>ECM.1229, ECM.1265, ECM.1273, ECM.1294, ECM.1308, ECM.1314, >>>>>ECM.1438, ECM.1533, ECM.1592, ECM.1612, ECM.1617, ECM.1621, >>>>>ECM.1622 >>>> >>>>Thanks for the results, Dann! It looks slightly disappointing, even >>>>considering the slow hardware. The results for Gothmog 0.4.2g on a Pentium >>>>IV 2.4 GHz: >>>> >>>>Found in: 1 sec = 72, 2 sec = 22, 5 sec = 26, 10 sec = 13, 30 sec = 15 >>>> >>>>I've never found the patience to run the test with more than 30 seconds >>>>per position. >>> >>>At 30 seconds, you solve 148. Your machine is about 3 times as fast as the one >>>I am using. >>> >>>So your results are about the same as crafty's: >>>149 at 2 min is the closest measure to your score. You seem to solve some >>>faster initially. >>> >>>If you have a weekend of machine time, I would be interested to know how your >>>program does given 15 minutes per position. The result of Gothmog is very >>>impressive to me. >> >> >>P4 2.4 is _maybe_ twice as fast as an Athlon 1 G. I'd put it at about 1.8 . . . >> >>anthony > >I think that it is dependent on the computer and only hearing P4 2.4 is simply >not enough information. > >I understood in the past that a computer that you buy is significantly slower >than a computer that you build i don't believe that... >and buy only the parts and the difference is more >than the difference between 1.8 and 2. but for instance the P4 1.4GHz i have at home is very old, one of the first of it's kind. it is 4 (!!) times slower at my chess program than my centrino 1.3 GHz was. while the 2.4GHz P4 at my office is nearly the same speed. the first P4s had *tiny* caches which i guess explains the difference. both are of the same brand, dell, so you can't epxlain it with "computers you buy". cheers martin > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.