Author: swaminathan natarajan
Date: 01:52:41 12/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
>Yes, think so! >But meaning with today available engines at the moment. >I cann't not know engines which are not available! > >Example: >Kaissa is a program which make Ruffian a lot of problems. >Ruffian losed every match vs. Kaissa in my tournaments. > >But Kaissa 1.7 is not stronger as Ruffian if I look in the results vs. other >engines. > >Ruffian - TheKing 2:2 >in my Arena tournament 6 ... > >No reason for me to say Ruffian is the strongest WB engines in the World. But in >combination with games against other engines is Ruffian clear stronger as >TheKing in this tournament. I have no other results and saw no other results. >For me is this reason enough to write this in the handbook. > >You can be sure, if I have only one other results I have never written that >Ruffian 2.0.0 is the strongest WinBoard engines in the world. I am sure I have >written is one of the strongest WinBoard engines in the world. See my other >message ... first sentence in the handbook and booklet! > >Best >Frank "you cant say stongest ever winboard engine in the world" if peaople knew about the engine and if buyer tried 100 games of Ruffian against Deep Sjeng if they find Ruffian lose by 100-0 marigin they say you are a cheater and you see Kaissa 1.8 is still private in tests result Kaissa easily won by 100-20 or something like this figure i dont remember what if Kaissa 1.8 wins a game or two agaist Ruffian 2.0? Kaissa is the winboard this is totally wrong and nonsense you can say Ruffian 2.0 is strongest engine that that won the tournament,finished ahead of The King,Rebel etc in Leiden
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.