Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 08:21:26 12/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 2003 at 11:03:04, scott farrell wrote: >On December 20, 2003 at 10:53:56, Jay Hysenbeg wrote: > >>hi, >>i was wondering what happens when u use low hash for a long time control. to the >>point where the hash is normaly filled before the eng has made its move. >>thank you >>jay h. > >well, things start to deteroriate, your move ordering isnt as good etc., and >your branching factor ends up so bad that it cant get from say 10 ply to 11 ply >or whatever, it sort of like hits a brick wall somewhere. > >To what extent this happends largely depends on your replacement scheme, and how >well it deals with overwriting entries. > >I test changes to my hash by running extremely small hashes, like 16k entries, >just to see how it will cater. > >Scott Size of hash tables seem to have much less influence than I have imagined. This showed a test over 50 games between Fritz 8 [96 MB hash] against Junior 8 [8 MB hash] and a second 50 games match Fritz 8 [8 MB hash] vs Junior 8 [96 MB hash]. The final result was in both matches almost identical [25m+10s]. Kurt
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.