Author: margolies,marc
Date: 14:30:55 12/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
I respectfully disagree with you, Franz. We can implicitly trust these people running board who were elected by us to be more worthy of our trust than an unknown poster. I also think that a (frequent)disclosure of interdiction methodology could only be exploited advantageously by the racist poster on his next attempt, making the moderator's job unecessarily difficult. I understand your sensitivity to the ideas of americans discerning what is an appropriate last name for any other national. The racist imposter also purported to be an american, however. So we can judge the norms of our own nation, I hope. On December 22, 2003 at 05:22:46, F. Huber wrote: >On December 21, 2003 at 20:21:53, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On December 21, 2003 at 16:36:28, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On December 21, 2003 at 13:48:51, Mike Byrne wrote: >>> >>>>The CCC Moderators have voted affirmatively to permanently ban: >>>> >>>>"John Niggapleze" >>>> >>>>Reason: The handle is clearly racist and is meant to intimidate and cause harm >>>>to our black members which violates our charter. CCC is inclusive and not >>>>exclusive, everyone is welcome to join CCC regardless of race, religion, and >>>>whatever else differentiates us from one another. >>> >>>Sorry Mike, >>> >>>I know that this isn´t my problem at all, but I´m just curious: >>> >>>Did you really check, if this isn´t his _true_ name? >>>Do you have an absolutely sure prove of it? >>> >>>Because if _not_, then _your_ ´action´ would be ´clearly racist´ in my opinion, >>>and also contradict the last two lines of your posting above. >>>(doesn´t this include ´regardless of name´ also?) >>> >>>Franz. >> >>Franz, >> >>I search the name "Niggapleze" - as far as I tell, that was not not valid name. >>The poster is from the US, I am sure that is not vaild name in the US. I >>searched his e-mail address , and the results speak for themselves. I am >>confident we did the right thing. >> >>Best, >> >>Michael > >Ok Michael, > >this is an explanation that I can accept! > >It simply would have been better to have included it already in your original >posting, then I´d never asked - and this thread hadn´t been necessary at all. > >Best regards, >Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.